Last week, Google announced a brand new algorithm for its search engine, called Hummingbird. Although Google often produces updates and enhancements (such as the “Caffeine Update” in 2010, and “Penguin” and “Panda” since), the last time Google introduced a brand new algorithm was 2001, so it is a big change.
Although Google has not given away many details, it said that Hummingbird is
focused on ranking information based on a more intelligent understanding of
search requests. As Internet data volumes explode we increasingly have to
type more and more words into Google Search to gain greater accuracy of
results. Often we need to conduct multiple searches to find the information
we are looking for, which is frustrating and time consuming.
This is because the Search results we currently receive reflect the matching
combination of key words that a search phrase contains, rather than the true
meaning of the sentence itself. Search results produced by Hummingbird will
reflect the full semantic meaning of longer search phrases, and should in
theory produce more accurate results.
For example Hummingbird will more greatly consider question words like “how”
“why”, “where” and “when” in search phrases, in addition to content
keywords. Hence Hummingbird moves the emphasis of search from “results” to
“answers”.
Google also has acknowledged that the number of mobile and voice-based
searches is increasing. Such voice searches are in natural language, and may
not therefore contain the keywords we might finesse on a computer keyboard.
These ‘on the fly’ searches are likely to return poor results using a
keyword search system.
This means that publishers will have less idea where the web traffic to their
website comes from. An underlying commercial motivation maybe that Google’s
premium products will continue to provide some keyword detail, hence
encouraging upgrades from free to paid-for Google products.
In both cases Google has been quietly introduced these changes without the hullaballoo that accompanies an Apple product launch, for example. Google has been encrypting search results since 2011, and we have all been using Hummingbird for 6-8 weeks now.
These understated actions also suggest that commercial or competitive motives are to the fore, rather than the altruistic ‘better user experience’ public positioning that Google is promoting. Few if any of us have noticed the improvements suggested by Hummingbird. There has been significantly more debate online by concerned webmasters concerned about the potential loss of their precious keywords statistics.
One beneficial result of Hummingbird should be that it creates a more even and fairer playing field for ‘the long tail’ of website publishers. Search keywords are dominated by large companies and brands who can afford to win the search word bidding war created by Google. Semantic search results are less predictable, and should enable small and niche website providers to gain a higher page ranking when a precise and complex search phrase is used.
Hummingbird is set to affect around 90 per cent of all Google search results, and search results will undoubtedly be affected, but to what degree is currently unclear. One conclusion we can draw is that Google is seeking to retain more data for its own purposes, thus providing it with a unique ‘data competitive advantage’. This will potentially enable Google to target consumers with advertising and promotions more accurately than any other advertiser or publisher.
0 comments:
Post a Comment